Almost
all musicians, at all levels and throughout life, can turn their instrument
into a kind of alter ego of their personality and musical sensibility. Over
time the sound of the instrument turns into the perfect ambassador of the
musician's thought, absorbing the human experience, emotions, technical
development, and other features related to the performer. Over time the
musician, always keeping his instrument with him and having the opportunity to
refine himself, succeeds in becoming a unique and solid indissoluble entity. It
was time ago and it is so today.
Unfortunately,
these opportunities today are not granted to the conductor, for the simple
reason that he rarely has his own instrument available with which to grow and
develop his personal idea of sound, phrasing, and spirituality. No orchestra
likes to become the projection of the personality of a conductor, because this
requires a constant, daily presence which implies sharing of thought,
subjugation and, above all, a constant effort, commitment and concentration.
Even the lucky ones, the “principal” conductors, are victims of a vicious cycle
that forces them to tour, performing with orchestras alien to their
sensibilities and a tour de force not very worthy of such men. The constant
turnover of musicians, perennially free-lance even in the most renowned orchestras,
prevents the consolidation of an orchestra and conductor sound print of their
own. Perhaps, not many are aware that today the greatest orchestras in the
world do not rehearse anymore. Do you have a concert lasting three hours? If
you're lucky, you get an hour of rehearsal, the dress rehearsal, and
immediately after, the concert. What is left for a conductor in search of
"something" that is not the cachet, the momentary glory and the
social success? Nothing, apart from the taxi waiting for you to take you to the
airport to repeat the same sad and inglorious performance the day afterwards.
The London Symphony are already in excited trepidation because Sir Simon
Rattle, their future permanent conductor from 2018, has already said he wants
to return to have three days of rehearsals for each concert. It is practically
an attack to the status quo, to the world and castes of the "disposable", to the money
machine and a slap to the mediocrity of high levels.
Nowadays
the conductor, if he is a conscious musician of the real reasons of music, must
make do with standard results, maybe of good technical level, but ephemeral and
fleeting. His continued presence is no longer welcome to orchestras and he, the
victim of historical circumstances, finds himself the last "undemocratic"
figure in a "democratic" world to which he, like it or not, is
subjected to. But this also concerns those instrumentalists, real sensitive
musicians, who would expect moments of spiritual elevation and instead find
themselves in a luxurious worker’s function. An exceptional musician, called as
a free-lance addition to the Royal Philharmonic, told me about a rehearsal of
Mahler's Second Symphony with a famous but now tired and world-weary conductor.
When at the end of a rehearsal, having performed it in bits and pieces, he
asked his companion next to him when they would do a full rehearsal, his reply
was: "Ah, but we have already played it a hundred times, and we know
it!" And so it was: a concert without real rehearsals.
Mahler
thanks for the polite attention and Music mourns for the humiliation undergone.
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento